Talk:HomePNA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 07:05, 20 March 2025 by imported>Christian75 (Undid revision 1268663699 by 2603:6010:2DF0:99E0:A96F:99AC:8BFC:6D80 (talk) Broke Wikiproject template)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 11 April 2016 by HLogic in topic Nontechnical Terminology
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell

Early comment

Does anyone else feel that this article reads like a advertisement on HomePNA?


Hello all.

With such little talk on this topic, I am getting second thoughts on the future of HomePNA.

I'm so gonna get HomePNA LAN stuff in my new place. --65.147.29.0 06:11, 1 August 2005 (UTC)Reply


This absolutely reads like advertising boilerplate; it is misleading and obfuscating at best, outright lies and distortion at worst--- how does one flag an article for review? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.244.227.194 (talk) 21:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, so I worked on it a bit. Feel free to improve further. This is notable technology and we need to be neutral and present in an encyclopedic manner.W Nowicki (talk) 22:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Clarifications

Hi ...

Among the advantages of HomePNA it is mentioned that :-

--  A maximum of fifty devices can be connected maintaining 10 Mbit/s speed. 

Q : Is this 10Mbps speed an Aggregate Speed or is it 10Mbps per device, which means an aggregate of 500Mbps??

-- The devices can be up to a thousand feet (300 m) apart, spread over ten thousand square feet (900 m²). 

Q : This I am not able to understand at all. if the devices can be 300 m apart, then the devices can be spread over an area of 70650 sq m (Pi * radius^2), why only 900 sq m ???

Pobably done my a marketing person, not a math major. :-) Anyway, yes, needs more technical detail and less fluff. W Nowicki (talk) 22:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HomePNA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nontechnical Terminology

Wouldn't "bandwidth" be a more appropriate term than "room" in the statement "A standard phone line has enough room to support..."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HLogic (talkcontribs) 15:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply