Talk:Compton length

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Zbxgscqf at 03:25, 9 March 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I made the Compton wavelength redirect to this... maybe it should be the other way around?

First paragraph needs to be expanded a lot.

Hi, I switched the order of the redirect. I think wavelength is by far the more standard usage, at least in my experience and according to Google. I also expanded the article by quite a lot. The Compton wavelength doesn't have anything to do with gravity, a priori, since it doesn't contain the gravitational coupling G. Of course, when you substitute in a Planck mass for m, it does, because the Planck mass depends on Newton's constant. --Joke137 17:46, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sounds fine, your article looks great... I dunno if I would do the math differently though, maybe larger and with better formatting? --Rmrfstar 03:25, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)