Theonomy
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Third-party Template:Basic Forms of government
Theonomy (from Greek theos "God" and nomos "law") is a hypothetical Christian form of government in which divine law governs societies.[1] Theonomists hold that societies should observe divine law, particularly the Old Testament’s judicial laws.[2] The movement’s chief architects were Gary North, Greg Bahnsen, and R.J. Rushdoony.[3]
Theonomy presumes biblical Israel’s Old Covenant judicial laws have not been abrogated, and therefore all civil governments must enforce them (including the specific penalties). Theonomy holds that all civil governments must refrain from coercion if Scripture has not prescribed their intervention (the "regulative principle of the state").[4][5][6]
Theonomy is distinct from the "theonomous ethics" proposed by Paul Tillich.[3]
Origin
Thomas Aquinas held, "if a sovereign were to order these judicial precepts to be observed in his kingdom, he would not sin."[7] Some have mistakenly referred to that as "General Equity Theonomy"[8] but it is in fact distinct from theonomy insofar as Aquinas believed the specifics of the Old Testament judicial laws were no longer binding. He instead taught that the judicial precepts contained varying degrees of universal principles of justice that reflected natural law.[9]
In Christian reconstructionism, theonomy is the idea that God provides the basis of both personal and social ethics in the Bible. Theonomic ethics asserts that the Bible has been given as the abiding standard for all human authority (individual, family, church, and civil) and that biblical law must be incorporated into a Christian theory of biblical ethics.
CriticsTemplate:Who? see theonomy as a significant form of dominion theology, which they define as a theocracy. Theonomy posits that the biblical law is applicable to civil law, and theonomists propose biblical law as the standard by which laws may be measured and to which they ought to be conformed.
Goals
Various theonomic authors have stated such goals as "the universal development of Biblical theocratic republics,"[10]Template:Rp exclusion of non-Christians from voting and citizenship,[11]Template:Rp and the application of Biblical law by the state.[12]Template:Rp Under such a system of biblical law, homosexual acts,[13]Template:Rp adultery, witchcraft, and blasphemy[14]Template:Rp would be punishable by death. Propagation of idolatry or "false religions" would be illegal[15] and could also be punished by the death penalty.[16][17]
More recent theonomic writers such as Joel McDurmon, former President of American Vision, have moved away from this position, stating that these death penalties are no longer binding in the new covenant.[18] Former pastor and theonomy critic, JD Hall, who debated McDurmon in 2015,[19] has argued that abandoning Mosaic penologies such as the death penalty means that McDurmon and others who hold similar positions cannot be said to hold to theonomy in any meaningful way.[20]
According to the theonomist Greg Bahnsen, the laws of God are the standard which Christian voters and officials ought to pursue. The civil law given to the nation of Israel, it is stated, is continuously binding, although apart from what he considers to be surrounding cultural connotations specific to this nation itself.Template:R
Relation to Reformed theology
Some in modern Reformed churches criticize any relationship between the historical Reformed faith and theonomy,[21] but other Calvinists affirm that theonomy is consistent with the historic Reformed confessions.[22]
See also
Related topics in Christianity: Template:Cols
- Canon law of the Catholic Church
- Divine command theory
- Christian reconstructionism
- Biblical law in Christianity
- Neo-Calvinism
- Law and Gospel
- Christian anarchism
- Theodemocracy
- Christian views on the Old Covenant
- The Handmaid's Tale
- Postmillennialism
Template:Colend Related topics in philosophy and other religions: Template:Cols
- Blasphemy law
- Macroethics and microethics
- Halachic state
- Halakha
- Islamism
- Religious censorship
- Religious law
- Sharia
- Supremacism
References
Further reading
Template:Further reading cleanup
- Primary sources by theonomists
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Secondary sources and criticisms
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
External links
- What is Theonomy? by Chalcedon Foundation
- Proof that Modern Theonomy Advocates the Historic Understanding of the Judicial Law
- Comments on an Old-New Error by Meredith Kline
- The Shadow of Christ in the Law of Moses by Vern Poythress
Template:Christian Reconstructionism Template:Religion and politics Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Relpolnav
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Summa Theologica, I-II, q. 104, a. 3
- ↑ Clausen, Mark A., Professor of History, Cedarville University "Theonomy in the Middle Ages". Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Rushdoony, R.J., 1973, The Institutes of Biblical Law, Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, pp. 38–39.
- ↑ Schwertley, Brian M., "Political Polytheism" Template:Webarchive
- ↑ McDurmon, Joel. The Bounds of Love: An Introduction to God's Law of Liberty. American Vision Press, 2016.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Hall, J.D. On Joel McDurmon’s Abandonment of Theonomy. (2016, October 22). Pulpit & Pen News. https://pulpitandpen.org/2016/10/21/on-joel-mcdurmons-abandonment-of-theonomy/
- ↑ See, for instance, Theonomy: A Reformed Critique published by the faculty of Westminster Theological Seminary and Westminster Seminary California. Also "The Westminster Confession of Faith: A Theonomic Document?" by Ligon Duncan.
- ↑ See Theonomic Ethics and the Westminster Confession Template:Webarchive by Kenneth Gentry, The New Puritanism: A Preliminary Assessment of Christian Reconstruction by Robert Bowman, Jr., Theonomy and the Westminster Confession Template:Webarchive by Martin Foulner, The Theonomic Precedent in the Theology of John Calvin by Christopher Strevel, and Calvinism and the Judicial Law of Moses Template:Webarchive by James Jordan, and The Theonomic Thesis in Confessional and Historical Perspective Template:Webarchive by Greg Bahnsen. Biblical Ethics and the Westminster Standards by Dr. W. Gary Crampton